StoryWorlds with Junot Díaz

StoryWorlds with Junot Díaz

Share this post

StoryWorlds with Junot Díaz
StoryWorlds with Junot Díaz
HOW STORIES FAIL, HOW STORIES SUCCEED: THE STRANGE CASE OF THE SUBSTANCE
StoryCraft

HOW STORIES FAIL, HOW STORIES SUCCEED: THE STRANGE CASE OF THE SUBSTANCE

Junot Díaz's avatar
Junot Díaz
Dec 17, 2024
∙ Paid
37

Share this post

StoryWorlds with Junot Díaz
StoryWorlds with Junot Díaz
HOW STORIES FAIL, HOW STORIES SUCCEED: THE STRANGE CASE OF THE SUBSTANCE
9
6
Share
Demi Moore in 'The Substance'

It’s often hard to find texts that exemplify some of the arguments I’ve been making about narrative in clear concise ways. And then a movie like The Substance comes along and bingo — straight on the syllabus it goes.

Please understand: I’m interested in the movie’s narrative assemblies and how they can help us write better. What I’m not here to do is argue about the relative merits of The Substance as a film — others have done this much better than I ever could.1

Whether one loves Fargeat’s film or hates it, considers it a feminist masterpiece or the essence of mid itself, is not really our point here. One can admire The Substance unreservedly and still recognize that the film is plagued by a host of classic structural problems — structural problems that a handsome well-made film starring Demi Moore could easily glamour away, but that would tear your average piece of prose fiction to pieces.

For me The Substance is a textbook case of what not to do in our stories, and is well worth studying from a technical point of view for precisely that reason.

So, let’s take a look at a few of the film’s narrative “fails” and see what solutions might be applied in the name of improving our own writing game…

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Junot Díaz
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share